The world of project management is familiar with the famous triangle of change. The triangle says that any side can change provided the other two sides balance the effect. The triangle commonly known as Scope Schedule Budget triangle has been the basis of project management for many gurus and experts in the field.
 |
| Picture taken from projectmanagementguru.com |
I however feel that the triangle needs a revision now. The triangle talks about the scope, cost, schedule and their effects on the quality, but it does not take in to account the morale, enthusiasm and the involvement of project employees or stakeholders. It has been shown via various surveys that a project with constantly changing scope, schedule or budget leads to low employee / stakeholders' morale or dedication and a low participating employee / stakeholder morale or dedication is much more likely to face failure even if the scope, cost and schedule are balanced.
I propose to encircle the triangle in a circle which I like to call the stakeholder morale limit (SML). This is the locus of all the points which define the employee /stakeholders' threshold of coping up or adjusting with regularly changing scope, schedule or budget for a project. All extensions/adjustments to the sides of the triangle are allowed only if the triangle still fits inside the circle. Any extensions outside the circle boundary are unacceptable as it takes the project to a low employee morale or dedication zone which would adversely effect the project outcome.
I welcome an open discussion on this if anyone is interested. Looking forward to exchanging a constructive argument on this.
